As a social conservative, one of the most troubling aspects of this presidential campaign has been the mediaās (and John McCainās) failure to flesh out Barack Obamaās āaudaciousā doublespeak on the issue of same-sex āmarriageā.
Hereās the question Obama was lucky enough to have never been asked in this campaign: What does it mean to say you support traditional marriage (one man, one woman) ā when you do so much to advance the pro-āgay marriageā cause, including denouncing state marriage-protection amendments like Prop 8 in California as ādiscriminatory and divisiveā?
Did you know that Obama has promised homosexual activists that he will work to fully repeal the federal Defense of Marriage Act? DOMA was signed into law by Bill Clinton in 1996 and protects states from being forced to recognize out-of-state āgay marriages.ā It was passed overwhelmingly by the Senate, 85-14, with Sen. Biden joining 28 other Democrats in voting yes. How liberal is Obamaās anti-DOMA scheme? Hillary Clinton, a trusted gay ally, pledged to repeal only part of DOMA.
Neither McCain nor Gov. Palin has made an issue of Obamaās extreme anti-DOMA sop to the homosexual crowd even though they had a clear opening. (One 2007 Quinnipiac poll revealed that a homosexual groupās endorsement of a candidate would be a net electoral loser among voters in Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania.) The result is that Obamaās DOMA Destruction Plan never surfaced in the debates and barely in the major media.
The Democratic spin on marriage has fooled a lot of voters. If you watched the presidential debates, including the Saddleback Church event with Pastor Rick Warren, you might have concluded that Obama and his running mate, Joe Biden, pretty much agree with McCain and Gov. Sarah Palin on same-sex āmarriage.ā
That is a precisely what the savvy strategists at the Obama/Biden campaign want you to think, as they strive to hide their candidatesā radical pro-gay agenda and portray themselves as reasonable moderates on this wedge issue. Truth is, the gulf between the tickets is the difference between saying you support marriage and actually doing something to protect it ā and NOT favoring policies like repealing DOMA that are completely in line with the homosexual activistsā goal of radically redefining this sacred institution.
McCain is a strong DOMA supporter who will embrace a Federal Marriage Amendment if he sees activist judges forcing āgay marriageā on the states. Obama, on the other hand, went from supporting DOMA in 2004 to calling it āabhorrentā as part of his radical promise to homosexual groups to overturn it. Obama is setting the stage for nationalizing āsame-sex āmarriageā (perhaps under the guise of ācivil unionsā), while reporters dutifully provide him cover by repeating his alleged opposition to same.
If only one major media reporter would ask Sen. Obama: how can you say you support traditional marriage and yet āabhorā a popular law (DOMA) that helps states to preserve it? Alas, we mere mortals have to choose sides ā and most politicians flip and then flop ā but apparently Obama, The One, is allowed to embrace both sides of an issue simultaneously and get away with it.
Consider the following Obama policies and rhetoric and ask yourself if this sounds like a man who supports traditional marriage:
- Obama congratulated homosexual activists for āgetting marriedā at a San Francisco Democratic gay event;
- Though Obama says he āpersonallyā opposes āgay marriage,ā he creates a distinction without a difference by supporting federal ācivil unions.ā Obama told the nationās leading homoseuxal lobby group: āI believe civil unions should include the same legal rights that accompany a marriage license.ā Interestingly, this stance has led Obama to support a bill to allow homosexual partners to immigrate to the United States just like married spouses;
- Obama promises gay activists that he will use the bully pulpit to advocate for homosexual adoption of children. Thus Americans may have to endure the absurd spectacle of a President Obama using the prestige of the White House to defend placing children in homes that are motherless or fatherless by design;
Obama said he ārespectsā the California supreme courtās 4-3 decision earlier this year forcing āgay marriageā on that state, even though it wiped out a previous statewide ballot vote by Californians to preserve marriage as between a man and a woman;
- Obama denounced the Federal Marriage Amendment as a mere āpolitical ployā;
- Obama dismisses a key passage in the New Testament Book of Romans and distorts Jesus Christās Sermon on the Mount to justify his pro-homosexuality agenda.
Considering the above, is it asking too much of the media to stop repeating the distortion that Obama and Biden support traditional marriage?
Appearing on the Ellen DeGeneres show, Sen. Biden eagerly told Ellen, a āgay-marriageā activist, that if he were a California voter he would vote ānoā on Prop 8 in California. How strange, since Prop 8 does nothing but reinstate the definition of marriage as between a man and a woman. (It does not affect same-sex ādomestic partners,ā who already receive the same benefits as married couples under California law.) Of course, earlier, in the vice-presidential debate, Biden claimed to oppose gay āmarriageā ā creating the false impression that he and Palin essentially agree on the same-sex-āmarriageā question.
John McCain blew it by not calling out his opponents on their āgay marriageā deception and their plans to do in DOMA. All he needed to say was that the Illinois Senator doesnāt have the guts to tell the truth ā that Obamaās āpersonalā opposition to āgay marriageā is meaningless because his pro-gay pledges would greatly advance the spread of homosexual āmarriageā across the land. With friends like Obama and Biden, McCain could have said, the beleaguered institution of marriage really doesnāt need enemies.